SharpThinking No. 182   Perspectives on Developments in the Law from Sharp-Hundley, P.C.     May 2020 Courts Crack Down On Summary Judgment Affidavits By John T. Hundley, John@sharp-hundley.com Litigators frequenting Illinois state courts had best beware: the requirements for affidavits supporting and opposing motions for summary judgment increasingly are being interpreted strictly. That’s the message being…

Read More

Litigation Law Roundup SharpThinking No. 179   Perspectives on Developments in the Law from Sharp-Hundley, P.C.   April 2020 Two E-Mails Sufficient To Invoke Specific Jurisdiction Two emails sent into Illinois from outside the state were sufficient contacts to force the sender to defend a defamation lawsuit in Illinois, a panel of the Appellate Court’s Third District…

Read More

Corporate Law Roundup SharpThinking No. 181     Perspectives on Developments in the Law from Sharp-Hundley, P.C.    April 2020 Separate Series Status Must Be Asserted Promptly By John T. Hundley, 618-242-0200, john@sharp-hundley.com A series limited liability company (“LLC”) may not rely on a conclusory assertion of its separate existence and may be estopped from asserting…

Read More

SharpThinking No. 177  Perspectives on Developments in the Law from Sharp-Hundley, P.C.   February 2020 Court Limits Liberal Citation Remedies By John T. Hundley, john@sharp-hundley.com An Appellate Court panel in Chicago has limited sharply the use of citations to discover assets to apply remedies provided by the garnishment statute. Contrasting the garnishment statute (735 ILCS…

Read More

Mortgage Law Roundup Sharp  Thinking No. 176   Perspectives on Developments in the Law from Sharp-Hundley, P.C.   January 2020 Default, Acceleration Terms Are Critical Condition Precedents By John T. Hundley, 618-242-0200, john@sharp-hundley.com Creditors and their collection counsel are being advised to read promissory notes and mortgages closely before filing suits thereon as a result of…

Read More

Conversion and negligence claims against a bank, arising from a lawyer’s forgery of a client’s
signature to a settlement check, are governed by the three-year statute of limitation of 810 ILCS 5/3-118(g), a panel in the Appellate Court’s Fifth District has held.

Read More